Information Framework (SID)

TM Forum Members Only
TM Forum Members Only
The full version of this page is only available to members of the TM Forum. Learn more about becoming a member.

In order to access a TM Forum Member only area of the website you must be a registered user and work for a TM Forum Member Company. If this applies to you please login above.

Not a Registered User? Register Now
Registration is free, quick and simple, and will give you access to a large library of TM Forum member content, industry documents, exclusive articles, commentaries, plus our web discussions and event features.

If you experience any problems logging in, please contact us.


RSS


Group Administrators
Group Experts
Highest ranked members of this group.
41018
Stephen Fratini
Telcordia Technologies
24112
Marc Flauw
Hewlett-Packard
19641
Nigel Davis
Ciena Corporation
18681
Dirk Rejahl
Mediaan/abs bv
18565
Johan Vandenberghe
Alcatel-Lucent
3090
Your Profile
TM Forum

Live from Team Action Week Baltimore - Wed, Jun 24, 2009

Share |

As Team Action Week Baltimore 2009 Day 3 comes to a close here in Baltimore, teammates, it’s time to provide you with a summary of today’s SID-related activities.

This morning was spent reviewing and discussing Assurance terminology used in the SID, the eTOM, and the TAM with representatives from the teams responsible for these three frameworks.  There are some inconsistencies.  For example, there is a SID L1 ABE named Service Trouble, but it is referred to as Service Problem in the eTOM, TAM, and the TM Forum interfaces.  We discussed different rationales for aligning the terminology, which will be the focus of an upcoming post to the eTOM and SID Communities so that, as promised in Monday’s blog, those of you interested in this topic can participate in the discussion in order to arrive at agreed upon terminology that is consistent across the frameworks.

The discussion also ranged into lower levels (L3) of the eTOM to begin aligning terminology across the L3s into which a L2 process decomposes.  We agreed that this would be done once agreement is reached for the higher level terms.

This morning we also met with the Resource Management team, reviewing the planned organizational enhancement where ”domain” teams will work across all of the Solution Frameworks and the Interface Program to implement changes for a specific set of functions.  We will be working with this team over the next few months to coordinate SID updates from recent and upcoming MTOSI work.

During the afternoon, Josh, JohnW, and JohnR joined up with eTOM team lead Kevin Scaggs and other eTOM team members to review and refine L4 work in progress.  Portions of the Fulfillment and Assurance L3 processes are being decomposed to L4 and, in some cases, to L5.  This level of decomposition will be published in the upcoming months.  For those interested in finding out more detail, work in progress can be found by following the link… http://collab.tmforum.org/sf/docman/do/listDocuments/projects.the_business_process_framework/docman.root.etom_sid_mapping

 

John Wilmes, Josh Salomon, John Reilly


Posted 06-24-2009 3:22 PM by John Reilly
We welcome your feedback! To comment on this blog post please either Log-In or Register to the TM Forum Community

Paid Advertisement
About TM Forum
Introduction, History, Board, Management Team...
Membership
How to Join, Benefits, Member List...
Community
Community Home, Groups & Teams, Blogs...
Conferences
Event Calendar, Management World, Supported Events...
Training & Webcasts
Upcoming Training Courses, Upcoming Webinars, Podcasts, On-Demand Webcasts...
Initiatives
Cable, Enabling Cloud Services, Government and Defense...
Best Practices & Standards
Frameworx, Business Process Framework (eTOM), Information Framework (SID)...
Resources
Document Library, Case Studies, White Papers
Research & Publications
Business Benchmarking, Newsletters, Insights Research...
Copyright © 1988-2012, TeleManagement Forum. All Rights Reserved
Contact Us
Careers with TM Forum
News Room
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Sitemap