Information Framework (SID)




Authenticated TM Forum members receive full access to the Online Community. We cannot verify that you work for a TM Forum member company and your access will be restricted as a result.

TM Forum members are able to make connections with other users; join groups; contribute to the wikis and participate in discussions.

To check if your profile is correctly configured please click here

To find out more about the benefits of TM Forum membership and how to join us click here

Contributions Tab - Need Help

New Ideas?

Group Administrators
Group Experts
Highest ranked members of this group.
11200
Stephen Fratini
Telcordia Technologies
10210
Nigel Davis
Nortel
5150
Dirk Rejahl
Mediaan/abs bv
3650
Johan Vandenberghe
Alcatel-Lucent
3650
Marc Flauw
Hewlett-Packard

Upcoming Events See all events
event
CSSU Call
(GMT-05:00) Eastern Time (US and Canada)

Live from Team Action Week Baltimore - Wed, Jun 24, 2009

Share |

As Team Action Week Baltimore 2009 Day 3 comes to a close here in Baltimore, teammates, it’s time to provide you with a summary of today’s SID-related activities.

This morning was spent reviewing and discussing Assurance terminology used in the SID, the eTOM, and the TAM with representatives from the teams responsible for these three frameworks.  There are some inconsistencies.  For example, there is a SID L1 ABE named Service Trouble, but it is referred to as Service Problem in the eTOM, TAM, and the TM Forum interfaces.  We discussed different rationales for aligning the terminology, which will be the focus of an upcoming post to the eTOM and SID Communities so that, as promised in Monday’s blog, those of you interested in this topic can participate in the discussion in order to arrive at agreed upon terminology that is consistent across the frameworks.

The discussion also ranged into lower levels (L3) of the eTOM to begin aligning terminology across the L3s into which a L2 process decomposes.  We agreed that this would be done once agreement is reached for the higher level terms.

This morning we also met with the Resource Management team, reviewing the planned organizational enhancement where ”domain” teams will work across all of the Solution Frameworks and the Interface Program to implement changes for a specific set of functions.  We will be working with this team over the next few months to coordinate SID updates from recent and upcoming MTOSI work.

During the afternoon, Josh, JohnW, and JohnR joined up with eTOM team lead Kevin Scaggs and other eTOM team members to review and refine L4 work in progress.  Portions of the Fulfillment and Assurance L3 processes are being decomposed to L4 and, in some cases, to L5.  This level of decomposition will be published in the upcoming months.  For those interested in finding out more detail, work in progress can be found by following the link… http://collab.tmforum.org/sf/docman/do/listDocuments/projects.the_business_process_framework/docman.root.etom_sid_mapping

 

John Wilmes, Josh Salomon, John Reilly


Posted 06-24-2009 3:22 PM by John Reilly
We welcome your feedback! To comment on this blog post please either Log-In or Register to the TM Forum Community

About TM Forum
Introduction, History, Board, Management Team...
Membership
How to Join, Benefits, Member List...
Community
Community Home, Groups & Teams, Blogs...
Conferences
Event Calendar, Management World 2010, Supported Events...
Training & Webcasts
Upcoming Training Courses, Upcoming Webinars, Podcasts, On-Demand Webcasts...
Initiatives
Content Encounter, Business Benchmarking, Revenue Management...
Best Practices & Standards
Frameworx, Business Process Framework (eTOM), Information Framework (SID)...
Resources
Document Library, Case Studies, White Papers, TM Forum TV, Glossary...
Research & Publications
Newsletters, Insights Research...
Copyright © 1988-2010, TeleManagement Forum. All Rights Reserved
Contact Us
Careers with TM Forum
News Room
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Sitemap