Be afraid, be very afraid...

Share |
Imagine sitting in a rural health clinic, streaming three-dimensional medical imaging over the web and discussing a unique condition with a specialist in New York. Or downloading a high-definition, full-length feature film in less than five minutes. Or collaborating with classmates around the world while watching live 3-D video of a university lecture.

Sounds like an advertisement for a fibre-based ISP, NBN or existing infrastructure operator, doesn’t it? Well, if that’s what you thought, you’d be wrong. It’s the opening gambit On Google’s official blog site announcing the company’s foray into ultra high-speed broadband networks in a small number of trial locations across the United States.

And that’s the sort of news that should send a shudder down the spine of every network provider in the world. The blog goes on say, “We plan to offer service at a competitive price to at least 50,000 and potentially up to 500,000 people.” More shuddering?

Why would Google want to build out its own fibre network? Probably because it can and it knows only too well that success in this area comes with content and applications, something it has copious amounts of already. The press release, err, I mean blog, goes on to say:

“Our goal is to experiment with new ways to help make Internet access better and faster for everyone. Here are some specific things that we have in mind:
  • Next generation apps: We want to see what developers and users can do with ultra high-speeds, whether it's creating new bandwidth-intensive "killer apps" and services, or other uses we can't yet imagine.
  • New deployment techniques: We'll test new ways to build fiber networks, and to help inform and support deployments elsewhere, we'll share key lessons learned with the world.
  • Openness and choice: We'll operate an "open access" network, giving users the choice of multiple service providers. And consistent with our past advocacy, we'll manage our network in an open, non-discriminatory and transparent way.”
Funny, I thought that’s what the existing telco infrastructure providers and national broadband networks were trying to do. Let’s not forget Google’s experimental WiFi network in Mountain View, the purpose of which is “to experiment and learn from”. 

Google has also been aggressively addressing the mobile segment in recent months with the release of the Nexus One Android based handset, the purchase of AdMob and the unveiling of Buzz, a desktop/mobile social networking service as well as reports that it would be bidding for wireless spectrum in India.  Tie all of this in with the plethora of applications Google already offers online it’s not hard to see a plan for total domination emerging.

The sceptics amongst us may believe that Google is doing this specifically because they think that US CSPs are woefully slow and have no interest in improving their services and that this is meant to kick them in the seat of the pants to get their acts in gear. However, of you piece together all the areas Google is 'experimenting' in, the picture is much broader and a lot more ambitious.

Google is becoming a behemoth to be reckoned with. The traditional telco operator and CSP world’s may not be able to put up much of a fight, either. If they do they could simply be bought out. There are very few companies in the world with the liquidity, continuous revenue stream and acquisition power that Google has. This may be the agent of change we least expected, but most likely to succeed.


Posted 02-11-2010 10:47 AM by Tony Poulos
Filed under: , , , , ,

Comments

Tony Poulos wrote re: Be afraid, be very afraid...
on 02-11-2010 6:45 PM

When asked to comment on the Google FTTH trials yesterday, Telstra CEO, David Thodey said: “The Google announcement in the US, there’s a trial, it’s only the US, we have spoken to Google about their intentions. It’s an interesting development. Google has already put [the Unity submarine cable] across the Pacific. We have many different relationships with a company like Google, from Sensis where we actually provide a lot of content to the Google sites... through to relationships around Gmail, through to, now, infrastructure – it’s a very many-faceted relationship.”

Sounds like Google has mastered the art of 'stickiness' as well!

Keith Willetts wrote re: Be afraid, be very afraid...
on 02-12-2010 4:33 AM

Jeez mate, you Aussies will fall for anything! Can’t help thinking this is one of those perennial Google shots across the bows like their supposed WiMax roll-out designed to rattle telcos into action. Google absolutely needs there to be high speed access , both fixed and mobile but are worried that telcos will drag their feet (not surprisingly since its all upside for Google, mostly downside for telcos.

The issue about fiber roll-out is not really the cost of deploying the fiber, its the civil engineering that goes with it - digging up streets unless you own the underground ducts or get a government somewhere to force open ducts. In fact the aspirant UK government, the conservatives, have already told BT that is what they will do - but then they also said they wouold outsource our personal  heath records managment  to Google !!

And anyway, even if you get into the ducts, the real problem is the last 100 yards ( or metres!) which is ususally buried cable or overhead cable.

Google has a big enough market cap to do almost anything it wants but I'll take a bet with you that digging up the streets is not going to be one of them.

Josh Goldfein wrote re: Be afraid, be very afraid...
on 02-12-2010 6:56 AM

The last 100 meters is a big hurdle for Google but what if they have something else in mind other than laying cable? Couldn't this be an experiment in localized wireless delivery? They've already rolled out municipal wifi service in Mountain View... Admittedly that was a very small scale experiment, but what if they used some combination of cable and wireless to solve the delivery issue?

James Warner wrote re: Be afraid, be very afraid...
on 02-12-2010 12:13 PM

Oooo

Big bad Google is going to bring mega bandwidth to 50,000 people.  That‘s nothing. Heck, most major college football stadiums hold twice that many folks.  This is a bluff of the highest order.

It’s one thing to manage thousands of servers.  But networks are a totally different animal.  They’re not contained in nice, comfy air-conditioned buildings. Networks are out amongst the rain, sleet and earthquakes.  And if that doesn’t cause a problem or 2, there’s always a backhoe waiting to dig and bust your cables.

And just how does Google plan to do this?  They can’t afford to dig up streets and you can bet the incumbent players won’t let them into their conduit.  This means they’ll have to lease dark fiber from someone else.  But that only gets them to within maybe a mile or so of the customer?  How do they actually traverse the last 100 yards?  Are they really prepared for the cost of trucks and installers?

This might work – maybe – in a dense metro area where you can serve a lot of people in a high-rise environment.  But if you live on Maple Street, I wouldn’t be holding my breath.

I will say this – if their puffery manages to get the current crop of ISPs and Telecoms providers to up their game then I’m all for it. Because one thing about the Google announcement is true – bandwidth is a national resource and a competitive edge.  So to that end, I tip my hat to them sparking the debate.  But other than that, methinks they’re trying to sell me the Brooklyn Bridge.

Stephen Fleece wrote re: Be afraid, be very afraid...
on 02-12-2010 3:04 PM

Why would Google dilute a high-margin, global footprint business with a geographically limited, low margin infrastructure business?  Putting POPs and strategic long-haul network routes aside, I think Google's forays into regional and local networks are experiments for data collection, government policy influence, and PR.

That said, CSPs and network operators still have every reason to be afraid.  But not because Google going to challenge them on moving bits.  That battle is in business models, deals, and OSI Layer 7+ of the network.

The Insider wrote re: Be afraid, be very afraid...
on 02-12-2010 10:18 PM

You guys can hypothesize all you like. Let me quote from an article published in VOIP News in May 2007 (yes 2007!):

"Starting a few years ago, Google began buying thousands of miles of so-called “dark fiber”--fiberoptic communications wiring that was installed in the ground but going unused. The fiber was historically cheap thanks to a fiberoptic building boom that had gone bust, allowing the Mountain View search giant to acquire large amounts of it for pennies on the dollar.

All this wiring represents more high-speed bandwidth than even Google can use right now, generating speculation about what the company will do with it, and theories range from innocent internal-data transport to world domination. Following are Google’s official story and three alternate theories about how the company might light up its cache of dark fiber."

Hmmm, what do you think now?

The Insider wrote Google is no whisp of an isp
on 03-18-2010 11:29 AM

A report released this week by Arbor Networks states that Google now boasts a network bigger than all

tribe.net: www.tmforum.org wrote Be afraid...
on 03-22-2010 1:01 PM

Remember the last time the global economy crashed, after all the telecoms too...

We welcome your feedback! To comment on this blog post please either Log-In or Register to the TM Forum Community

Paid Advertisement
About TM Forum
Introduction, History, Board, Management Team...
Membership
How to Join, Benefits, Member List...
Community
Community Home, Groups & Teams, Blogs...
Conferences
Event Calendar, Management World, Supported Events...
Training & Webcasts
Upcoming Training Courses, Upcoming Webinars, Podcasts, On-Demand Webcasts...
Initiatives
Cable, Enabling Cloud Services, Government and Defense...
Best Practices & Standards
Frameworx, Business Process Framework (eTOM), Information Framework (SID)...
Resources
Document Library, Case Studies, White Papers
Research & Publications
Business Benchmarking, Newsletters, Insights Research...
Copyright © 1988-2012, TeleManagement Forum. All Rights Reserved
Contact Us
Careers with TM Forum
News Room
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Sitemap