BSS is dead, long live BSS!

Share |
For many years the terms BSS and OSS very clearly differentiated two distinct parts of every CSP business. I you haven't heard these two acronyms before then don't bother reading any further.

The combination of transformation to all-IP networks and convergence of services has effectively (and supposedly) blurred the boundaries between BSS and OSS. We have all heard this, but is it actually happening in the real world?

If it is, how do we now define the functions that traditionally fell in the BSS camp and are obviously money related (like billing), customer related (like CRM, Customer Experience and profiling), data related (like analytics), revenue assurance, fraud and enterprise risk management where revenues are impacted?

If BSS really is passé then what term, if any, should we use to collectively address the examples above? There is no prize for the winning suggestion but your contribution may well go down in history.  And don't think this is easy. Many clever suggestions have already been shot down within the TM Forum ranks. Without wishing to offend any Americans out there, let's try and avoid three and four letter acronyms that you are so famous for (and that most of the rest of us don't understand). ;-)

Your suggestions in reply are most welcome, as are any comments you may have regarding the great BSS/OSS divide, especially if you work in a CSP. The lines are now open!


Posted 07-14-2010 4:47 PM by The Insider
Filed under: , , ,

Comments

Ashok Kadam wrote re: BSS is dead, long live BSS!
on 07-23-2010 9:36 AM

Even though BSS and OSS system stack and services are getting convergent, they can be readily differentiated. All systems that are customer-facing would come under BSS (like billing,mediatio,revenue assurance,fraud management,CRM). All systems that are network-facing would come under OSS(like service provisioning,service activation,network management systems)

Russell Harrison wrote re: BSS is dead, long live BSS!
on 07-24-2010 10:40 PM

I also agree there are clear boundaries.  SPs are moving to an articulated architecture where there are market-oriented channels (primary users of BSS) and network-oriented operations (primary users of OSS).  Each channel may sell components from various networks (in contrast to the stovepipe architecture of the past).  The nexus is the ability to flexibly map products (market focus) to services (network focus) across the relevant systems.

Nischal Doshi wrote re: BSS is dead, long live BSS!
on 07-27-2010 4:59 AM

I too believe that there is reasonably clarity to differentiate BSS and OSS systems at least in logical view. The differentiation criteria could be logical view, technical/solution view or process view. One can take end-to-end process view, where processes cut across business and operations teams. As part of process there will be some systems, which will fall on border line. On the ground, it is likely to vary from CSP to CSP and how the organization depts are structured with control on respective systems. It is possible to have unification of some systems as part of transformtaion programs being run by CSPs. Ultimately, its all about business. Not a big fan of acronyms but what if someone does create an acronym from "Unified Support System for Business & Operations"?

vorachai narichaikusn wrote re: BSS is dead, long live BSS!
on 07-27-2010 5:50 AM

Although the BSS and OSS seem to have little boundary network oriented. But some area there is an overlap. For instant the OSS may have customer care network monitoring. Then it will effect to revenue of operator and CRM.

Mahesh Bhat wrote re: BSS is dead, long live BSS!
on 07-29-2010 8:41 AM

I agree with you all. There is still a clear difference between BSS and OSS though these systems are converging. Infact, over past few years there has been more focus with respect to BSS systems which was unheard of because of the competition and customer expectations from CSP. Do we need a new term, yes, there is no harm in introducing new terms as we are used to new terminologies every 3-5 years .

Jagadish Baddukonda wrote re: BSS is dead, long live BSS!
on 08-06-2010 7:18 AM

The differentiation between BSS and OSS is blurring. Earlier Mediation was referred to as an OSS application. Now, Mediation, Charging and even IN are being referred to as BSS.

Order Management is not longer an application – It is a process spanning across multiple applications. The same with Product modeling.

Hence instead of referring to stacks like BSS and OSS, it would be better if we talk in terms of functional processes like Customer Management, Order Management etc and then think of the underlying applications.

We welcome your feedback! To comment on this blog post please either Log-In or Register to the TM Forum Community

Paid Advertisement
About TM Forum
Introduction, History, Board, Management Team...
Membership
How to Join, Benefits, Member List...
Community
Community Home, Groups & Teams, Blogs...
Conferences
Event Calendar, Management World, Supported Events...
Training & Webcasts
Upcoming Training Courses, Upcoming Webinars, Podcasts, On-Demand Webcasts...
Initiatives
Cable, Enabling Cloud Services, Government and Defense...
Best Practices & Standards
Frameworx, Business Process Framework (eTOM), Information Framework (SID)...
Resources
Document Library, Case Studies, White Papers
Research & Publications
Business Benchmarking, Newsletters, Insights Research...
Copyright © 1988-2012, TeleManagement Forum. All Rights Reserved
Contact Us
Careers with TM Forum
News Room
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Sitemap