Analysts need to polish their crystal balls

Share |

A news story from Reuters today states that mobile data revenue is expected to jump 23 percent this year thanks to increased usage of smartphones and tablets, as the number of global mobile connections reaches 5.6 billion this year.

Quoting research firm Gartner, it says that mobile data services revenue will total $314.7 billion this year, a 22.5 per cent increase from 2010, and added that, in four years, mobile data sales will reach $552 billion.

In another stroke of reporting genius, the article goes on to say that telecom operators have pinned high hopes on surging mobile data usage but have been slow to turn high demand into high revenue.

Quoting Jessica Ekholm, principal research analyst at Gartner, “data revenue will continue to grow but at a much slower rate. This is causing a decoupling between revenue and data traffic, and is creating an increase in network costs for carriers as they try to sustain growing data traffic.”

So tell us something new! We already know that “operators are struggling to manage capacity and pricing so that a few heavy users do not clog up networks and deny average downloaders reliable speeds, access and predictable bills.”

Not satisfied at reporting the ‘bleeding obvious’ that would have taken two phone calls to operators and a quick look at the TM Forum blog site to deduce, the experts go on to say that operators “do not want to be relegated to ‘dumb pipes’ or be stuck with the bill for network investment while services and application providers such as Google and Facebook reap the benefits.”

Give me strength!

In a final stroke of genius Sylvain Fabre, research director at Gartner, is quoted as saying, “what carriers need are innovative ways to increase data revenue while finding smart solutions to manage a growing demand in data.”

“Ultimately, it will be the consumer who chooses the content he or she wants to use, and carriers need to ensure the quality of experience is good. A sub-standard user experience may lead to higher churn.”

This is where The Insider took out the Swiss Army knife to slash both wrists. Luckily, there were so many attachments he could only manage to unfurl the corkscrew and had to resort to another bottle of local French wine to drown his sorrows!

Everyone is aware that a number of operators have ditched unlimited offers, instead offering capped data plans for dongles and fixed caps for smartphone users, but that will not resolve the continuing issue of falling margins. It would be OK if all operators in a market could simply change everyone to capped plans but surely, regulators would get very suspicious if they did.

Operators in most markets are frowned upon if they try and throttle the data abusers, ‘net neutrality’ rules are emerging and they still have to make heavy investment in infrastructure in order to keep providing the service levels their customer expect, without them necessarily paying for it.

Then, of course, are the competitive pressures from other operators keen to steal some market share, even at a loss. So please, all you analysts out there, don’t keep telling us what we already know – use some of those incredible insights into the future you possess, polish up those crystal balls, and tell us how we can avoid dropping margins, increased network traffic, increased investments, and still survive.


Posted 08-04-2011 4:36 AM by The Insider
Filed under: , , ,

Comments

Morag Lucey wrote re: Analysts need to polish their crystal balls
on 08-10-2011 6:59 AM

It would be good to get analyst insight on OpenFlow a major networking development that promises to completely overhaul Internet network architecture – driving down costs for broadband providers and data centers. www.convergys.com/.../openflow-net-neutrality-and-the-new-economics-of-networking

Dharmendra Misra wrote re: Analysts need to polish their crystal balls
on 08-23-2011 11:20 PM

SDN- Software Defined Tony's article, I take these two as two different things. In simple words I believe that SDN is more to do with network layer and the article above at application layer.

There are many reasons to believe on the article and we had many situations in past where extreme forecasting were done, not duite different to what is happening/has happened in stock market. There are different perspective to each recommendations and unfortuntely the bridge is missing that can collaborate all perspectives and come up with more realistic forecast.

It becomes more painful where these isolated publications are from same business house. I have no dobut on individual analyst's approach but till consstructive debate doesnt happen, collaborated analysis doesnt happen, we'll continue to have extreme ends in publications.

Good thing is, whereever industry swings, Gartner will always have opportunity to claim that its analysis was correct :-)

We welcome your feedback! To comment on this blog post please either Log-In or Register to the TM Forum Community

Paid Advertisement
About TM Forum
Introduction, History, Board, Management Team...
Membership
How to Join, Benefits, Member List...
Community
Community Home, Groups & Teams, Blogs...
Conferences
Event Calendar, Management World, Supported Events...
Training & Webcasts
Upcoming Training Courses, Upcoming Webinars, Podcasts, On-Demand Webcasts...
Initiatives
Cable, Enabling Cloud Services, Government and Defense...
Best Practices & Standards
Frameworx, Business Process Framework (eTOM), Information Framework (SID)...
Resources
Document Library, Case Studies, White Papers
Research & Publications
Business Benchmarking, Newsletters, Insights Research...
Copyright © 1988-2012, TeleManagement Forum. All Rights Reserved
Contact Us
Careers with TM Forum
News Room
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Sitemap