Welcome to TM Forum Community Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

Are Pundits and Consumers on the Same Page?

Frankly I’m tired of reading about what pundits think consumers’ want when it comes to new media services, personalized content and ad supported services.  Nothing against these fine folks – I know many of them and consider them friends and colleagues. But strip away our day jobs and we’re all consumers. 

Each of us decides which grocery stores, cleaners and restaurants we’ll patronize.  Where we will buy tires, tools and furniture.  These are the day-to-day decisions we all make and communications and entertainment services are no different.

The fact that we happen to be in the communications or digital media industry doesn’t make us different.  It doesn’t make us more or less willing to accept free services in exchange for seeing ads.  It doesn’t mean we want to watch movies on our mobile phones just because it’s technologically possible to do so.

Maybe we do.  Maybe we want every sort of content available wherever we are, on whichever device we have in our hands.  Frankly, that’s what I’m hearing.  But there’s a tiny voice in my head that’s saying, “I’m not so sure.”

What do you want?   What do you want and what will you not tolerate?  Forget who signs your paycheck and respond as a human being.  What kinds of digital media services do you want, how do you want them delivered; to what types of devices and what are you willing to pay (or not pay).

It’s all fine and good to get enthralled with the art of the possible. But at the end of the day, when we sit in our offices, drive in our cars, travel like dogs and sometimes get to be home – what sorts of new, Digital Media services to do we want?  

If we can’t answer this honestly, I’m not sure our hopes and plans will stand the test of time.
Published Monday, May 05, 2008 10:36 AM

Comments

NikW said:

Well I'm with you on not being dictated to over what I want as a consumer, but let's be honest - unless the idea is just crazy or poorly implemented, we as consumers lap it up. We'll even put up with poor quality if it gets us there.

When mobile video and camera phones appeared on the scene a few years ago, many people couldn't see the attraction. Why would I want to take a grainy photo with a camera phone, then send it out to the world immediately, when I can take a high resolution photo and e-mail it just a few hours later? The answer is purely convenience and the growing impatience of society.

The convenience of being able to access a library of digital content through any device is appealing. Being able to access my iTunes library or make a purchase and download over the air is appealing... but hold on - I can already do that.

Streaming video to my mobile device sounds great - and the idea of being able to pick up on that episode of Heroes on my mobile device from the same point I left it on my TV certainly sounds cool. But I can live with downloading it to my mobile device over the WiFi network at and then watching it on the train journey home. Would I pay for this? Sure if it saves me time and is bundled with the rest of my subscription.

The uncomfortable truth is that a lot of these services require no new technology,  - just greater prevelance of mobile broadband. Surely that will just leave service providers out in the cold, serving up bandwidth at ever-decreasing prices?
May 6, 2008 5:07 AM
Anonymous comments are disabled

Syndication