The Case for Enforcing the Adoption of OSS/J Order Management API

Share |

The TM Forum recently released its new standards-based OSS/J order management API – called Information Framework JSR-264 – that enables OSS providers to fully interoperate with certified BSS and CRM vendors. This TM Forum open API standard eases interoperability among back-office and CRM vendors, resulting in speedier service rollouts, improved operational efficiencies and reduction in deployment costs by as much as 30 percent.

As Next-generation Operators (NGOs) undergo service transformation and evaluate back-office vendors, they can have the upper hand by mandating the adoption of the newest standards-based APIs to simplify the transformation process. Standardized APIs remove a major bottleneck that slows the introduction of new services: interoperability among OSS, billing and CRM solutions.

While the Order Management API is becoming commonplace as a requirement in customer contracts, many BSS/OSS vendors have been slow to adopt it. OSS solutions based on proprietary APIs cannot cope with the rapidly increasing scale of networks, the diversity of communications technology, the required shortened time to market for new services and the increased expectations for availability and reliability. NGOs need to capitalize on the latest developments and require their vendors to adopt the latest API. Without having other vendors standardized on this latest API, NGOs are forced to engage in time-consuming and budget draining integration projects to automate BSS-OSS order capture and management. The OSS/J order management API enables NGOs to select best-of-breed solutions and provides the operator and its vendors with consistent models of communication to make new concepts/capabilities easier to add through the back-office or IT chain.

One of the reasons to postulate on why the OSS/J order management API has not been broadly adopted by some of the “upstream” BSS vendors is the scope of functionality from the earlier version of the API, which only encompassed activation and provisioning.  The latest standard can also be used for resources, work orders and other capabilities, giving it a broader set of functionality.  Solutions based on this API can reuse the wealth of existing subscriber, service/network inventory and order management domain knowledge captured in the API— without requiring the operator to reinvent the wheel — thus reducing development and integration costs among deployed OSS, BSS and NMS systems.

NGOs and the TM Forum have put a lot of effort into the latest OSS/J management API. In order to reap the full benefits, service providers should expect all back-office system providers to adopt the API into their solution.



Posted 09-28-2010 8:43 AM by Brian Cappellani

Comments

Yishai Brown wrote re: The Case for Enforcing the Adoption of OSS/J Order Management API
on 10-19-2010 11:52 AM

Thanks Brian for advocating the use of standard specifications.

The OSS/J API specifications have been embraced into the TM Forum as a result of the M&A of www.ossj.org (now part of the TM Forum).

I would like to bring justice the home grown interface specification MTOSI that addresses ordering aspects for the resource (Resource provisioning and activation) and service (Service management) domains.

Evidently the acquisition of OSS/J created some overlap between the two interface initiatives. This triggered the establishment of the TM Forum Integration program (TIP).

The Ordering & Activation sub-team in TIP is mandated to harmonize the two ingredients.

The general TIP roadmap can be found through:

www.tmforum.org/.../Home.html

or directly from: collab.tmforum.org/.../doc8250

Though an effort will be made to be as close as possible to the ingredient specifications, unavoidably backward compatibility will not be present.

The Ordering & Activation are planning to propose an upgrade path from both (OSS/J & MTOSI).

It would be a fare assumption to make that choosing a standard specification (either OSS/J or MTOSI) is better than a proprietary one for the short term.

On the other hand, I cannot make a decisive recommendation which one to choose.

TIP O&A is our target.

Yishai Brown

In capacity of the TIP steering team leader

We welcome your feedback! To comment on this blog post please either Log-In or Register to the TM Forum Community

Paid Advertisement
About TM Forum
Introduction, History, Board, Management Team...
Membership
How to Join, Benefits, Member List...
Community
Community Home, Groups & Teams, Blogs...
Conferences
Event Calendar, Management World, Supported Events...
Training & Webcasts
Upcoming Training Courses, Upcoming Webinars, Podcasts, On-Demand Webcasts...
Initiatives
Cable, Enabling Cloud Services, Government and Defense...
Best Practices & Standards
Frameworx, Business Process Framework (eTOM), Information Framework (SID)...
Resources
Document Library, Case Studies, White Papers
Research & Publications
Business Benchmarking, Newsletters, Insights Research...
Copyright © 1988-2012, TeleManagement Forum. All Rights Reserved
Contact Us
Careers with TM Forum
News Room
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Sitemap