Developers Community

TM Forum Members Only
TM Forum Members Only
The full version of this page is only available to members of the TM Forum. Learn more about becoming a member.

In order to access a TM Forum Member only area of the website you must be a registered user and work for a TM Forum Member Company. If this applies to you please login above.

Not a Registered User? Register Now
Registration is free, quick and simple, and will give you access to a large library of TM Forum member content, industry documents, exclusive articles, commentaries, plus our web discussions and event features.

If you experience any problems logging in, please contact us.


RSS


Group Administrators
Group Experts
Highest ranked members of this group.
41018
Stephen Fratini
Telcordia Technologies
24112
Marc Flauw
Hewlett-Packard
19641
Nigel Davis
Ciena Corporation
18681
Dirk Rejahl
Mediaan/abs bv
18565
Johan Vandenberghe
Alcatel-Lucent
3090
Your Profile
TM Forum

Developer Network

The City of Angels Steps into the Clouds

Share |

The City Council of Los Angeles recently voted to migrate all of their email services to Google’s email system. This is the largest and boldest move by any US Government body with regard to the move to cloud computing.

All 30,000 city employees will move to Google’s cloud over the next year, changing every government email account from Microsoft supported to Gmail.

The L.A. Times article continues:

“Before the vote, several council members had voiced objections to the contract, including whether the city would see any real cost savings, as Google had contended, and when the new system would be ready to store data from law enforcement, where security standards are more rigorous.

Because Los Angeles will be among the earliest adopters of the Google system, council members expressed concern that the city might be signing on before Google’s cloud system was fully proven.

The contract was approved pending an amendment that would require Google to compensate the city in the event that the Google system was breached and city data exposed or stolen. No such clause existed in the contract.”

Emphasis added.

I think it is very interesting that the contract had to be amended to include compensation in the event of any loss of data. This reinforces the point that we are all still ultimately responsible for our data, and the use of a cloud environment doesn’t change this in any way. The cloud environment simply forces us to ensure that the security checks in place by the cloud providers is, at a minimum, better than any security you would have provided for your data while in your possession.




Posted 10-30-2009 11:09 AM by Joann O'Brien

Comments

Nik Willetts wrote re: The City of Angels Steps into the Clouds
on 10-30-2009 11:49 AM

Whilst we may never know, I wonder how this will be received by Google. Accepting liability for data loss is a mine field for software vendors and SaaS vendors alike, because the value of that data could be potentially huge, and typically such agreements either heavily limit or deny all liability for data loss. Most scenarios where data is stolen are due to the weakest link in security - the individual user.

The reality is that economies of scale and competence mean that, in most cases, an in-house IT team will not have the security and backup facilities which comes as part of the package with a service provided by a major vendor such as Google. However, the size of such operations also mean they are a much larger target for hackers.

This issue of control remains a key issue for Cloud/SaaS adoption at the enterprise scale. Vendors will need to provide confidence and flexibility to buyers to capture major contracts.

Ultimately where I see Cloud/SaaS applicaitons winning is not just through reduced cost and lower infrastructure hassles for the buyer, but also functionality. Google Mail already incorporates far more readily functionality which more traditional desktop solutions do not, and the speed of roll-out of new functionality is far greater online than in installed software packages. Evolution to collaborative platforms like Google Wave may well seal the deal - as the decision becomes more than just cost saving.

We welcome your feedback! To comment on this blog post please either Log-In or Register to the TM Forum Community

Paid Advertisement
About TM Forum
Introduction, History, Board, Management Team...
Membership
How to Join, Benefits, Member List...
Community
Community Home, Groups & Teams, Blogs...
Conferences
Event Calendar, Management World, Supported Events...
Training & Webcasts
Upcoming Training Courses, Upcoming Webinars, Podcasts, On-Demand Webcasts...
Initiatives
Cable, Enabling Cloud Services, Government and Defense...
Best Practices & Standards
Frameworx, Business Process Framework (eTOM), Information Framework (SID)...
Resources
Document Library, Case Studies, White Papers
Research & Publications
Business Benchmarking, Newsletters, Insights Research...
Copyright © 1988-2012, TeleManagement Forum. All Rights Reserved
Contact Us
Careers with TM Forum
News Room
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Sitemap