Beyerstein's pseudo-science criteria

What are the characteristics of pseudo-science?  Here is Beyerstein's list of characteristics of pseudoscience as exposed in Patrick’s Lambe’s post on “Is KM a pseudoscience?“:

1. Isolation – failure to connect with prior and parallel disciplines
2. Non-falsifiability – no means to invalidate hypotheses
3. Misuse of data – leveraging data out of context or beyond validity
4. No self-correction, evolution of thought – often centred round a single ‘thought-leader’
5. Special-pleading – the claim that this is a special-case that can’t be measured in any other terms
6. Unfounded optimism – unrealistic expectations
7. Impenetrability – an over-dependence on complicated ideology and obfuscation, or bluster in place of debate
8. Magical-thinking – such as “the belief that good things will result from willpower alone”
9. Ulterior motives – particularly ulterior motives of a commercial kind
10. Lack of formal training – including certification schemes that link back to #4
11. Bunker mentality – such as complaints about being ‘misunderstood’ by others, and often linked to #5 and #7
12. Lack of replicability of results – especially replicability by others under controlled conditions