| | Information Framework (SID)
The full version of this page is only available to
members of the TM Forum. Learn more
about becoming a member.
In order to access a TM Forum Member only area of the website you must be a registered
user and work for a TM Forum Member Company. If this applies to you please login
above.
Not a Registered User? Register Now
Registration is free, quick and simple, and will give you access to a large library
of TM Forum member content, industry documents, exclusive articles, commentaries,
plus our web discussions and event features.
If you experience any problems logging in, please
contact us.
| | | Browse by Tags Sorry, but there are no more tags available to filter with. -
Howdy, teammates thought you might be interested in my latest Training blog that makes a case for this, while still retaining the concept of a Service in our frameworks... http://www.tmforum.org/community/blogs/tmforum_training/archive/2010/08/26/farewell-to-the-service-domain.aspx To add a little not... -
Howdy, teammates...just to stir up the pot a little, you may want to take a look at my latest blog... http://www.tmforum.org/community/blogs/tmforum_training/archive/2010/07/29/crabby-at-team-action-week-baltimore-2010.aspx -
A good addition/change to SID model would be to have a classification of Resources similar to how Services are classified into Customer Facing and Resource Facing (through specialisation), i.e. it would be good to have a model which would enable distinguishing between Resources that Customer is aware... -
Howdy, teammates...a recurring question that arises in the community surrounds the relationship between Products, Services, and Resources and examples of these. There is a SID Wiki Golden Nugget on this that can be found at http://www.tmforum.org/community/groups/information_framework_sid/wiki/product... -
As Ben points out in the thread, we have found that the configuration pattern that is under development, applied to Product as "Product Configuration" serves the role of CFS (Customer Facing Service). The configuraiton pattern applied to Service provides the notion of RFS (Resource Facing Service... -
Hi Everyone, I would like to point out to an inconsistency in the Figure 4Q-5 of the QoS Addendum. It shows the relationfrom Physical Resources and Logical Resources to Resource Facing Services to be of cardinality 0..1. However, it is 0..n in all other documents (e.g. Figure SO.6 in Service Overview... -
Hi All, I have noticed a possible inconsistency in the PhysicalResource Addendum. Page 38, Figure 18 shows an association named "SpecificesPhysicalResourceRoles" between PhysicalResourceSpec and PhysicalResourceRole. This association can also be verified from the Rational Rose HTML SID Model...
| | Paid Advertisement
| | |  | | Copyright © 1988-2012, TeleManagement Forum. All Rights Reserved | | | | | |
| |
|