TM Forum — How to manage Digital Transformation, Agile Business Operations & Connected Digital Ecosystems
    • Log in
    • Register
  • Knowledge
    • Knowledge overview
    • Research & insights
    • Themes
      • Data + AI
      • Autonomous Operations
      • Cloud Native IT + Networks
      • Ecosystems
      • People + Planet
  • Labs
    • Labs overview
    • Co-creating solutions (Catalysts)
    • Member projects
    • Innovation Hub
    • Hackathon
    • Global Architecture Forum (GAF)
  • Open Digital Architecture (ODA)
    • Open Digital Architecture (ODA)
      • Get started with ODA
      • ODA component directory
      • Running on ODA
      • Ready for ODA
      • Governance
      • Business Architecture Overview
      • Information Systems
      • Implementation Architecture
      • Deployment and Runtime
    • How to apply ODA
      • Member resources
      • Member toolkits
      • Intent-based Automation
      • CaaS
      • NaaS
      • AI / AN
      • Autonomous Networks
    • Open APIs
      • Open API Directory
      • Open API Conformance Certification
      • Open API Project
      • Open APIs Dashboard
      • Open API Training
      • Open API Stories
    • Business Process Framework (eTOM)
    • Information Framework (SID)
  • Training + accreditation
    • Training + accreditation overview
    • Training
      • Training courses
      • Enterprise training
      • Recommended courses
      • Course bundles
      • Success stories
    • Certification
      • What is Certification?
      • TM Forum Skill Paths
      • Certification Leaderboard
    • Conformance
      • Overview
      • Certifications Awarded
      • Business Process Framework Conformance
      • Information Framework Conformance
      • Open API Conformance
    • Services
  • Events
    • Upcoming events + webinars
    • Sponsorship opportunities
  • Membership
    • About Membership
    • Benefits
    • Current members
    • Become a member
    • 2024 Annual Meeting of Members
    • Open Sessions
  • Log in
  • Register
Back to top

Home Page > Certifications Awarded > NSN Service Management & MS Operations Lifecycle Framework (SMC and NOC) V2.0 > NSN Service Management & MS Operations Lifecycle Framework (SMC and NOC) V2.0 – Business Framework


  • Education & Development
    • About Education & Development
    • Course catalog
    • Recommended courses
    • Course bundles
    • Enterprise Training
    • Success stories
    • Certification
      • What is Certification?
      • TM Forum Skill Paths
      • Certification Leaderboard
      • FAQs
      • Exams
  • Conformance
    • Overview
    • Process Overview
    • Certifications Awarded
    • Business Process Framework Conformance
    • Information Framework Conformance
    • Open API Conformance
    • Success Stories
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Marketing support

nsnImplementation Title: Service Management & MS Operations Lifecycle Framework (SMC and NOC)
Implementation Version: Version 2.0
Framework Version: Version 12.0
Business Process Framework Version: Version 12.0
Information Framework Version: Not applicable
Assessment Completion Date: February 2014
Detailed Certification Report: NSN SMCNOC Frameworx12 Certification Report

Business Process Framework Assessment Summary

TM Forum has reviewed and approved the self-certification of the product listed here against Business Process Framework (eTOM) version 12 processes elements. Each process element was measured using the Business Process Framework (eTOM) conformance scale.

Scope of Assessment – Business Process Framework Footprint

The following figures represent the Business Process Framework Level 2 processes that were presented in scope for the assessment.

NSN_SMCNOC-BPF-01

Business Process Framework 12 – Operations Level 2 processes in scope for NSN Service Management & MS Operations Lifecycle Framework (SMC and NOC) Assessment

The following graph represents the Business Process Framework Level 2 processes that were submitted for the Assessment and the coverage of the Level 2 processes in terms of number of Level 3 processes submitted in scope.

NSN_SMCNOC-BPF-02

Level 2 processes submitted for Frameworx Conformance Assessment showing coverage for the contained Level 3 processes

Scope of Assessment – Business Process Framework Footprint

The following charts gives an overview of the conformance scores granted to the Business Process Framework Level 3 processes presented in scope for ZTE Corporation ZSmart, Business Process Framework Assessment.

NSN_SMCNOC-BPF-03

Business Process Framework – Conformance Result Summary [1/2]

NSN_SMCNOC-BPF-04

Business Process Framework – Conformance Result Summary [2/2]

 The following table provides a more detailed breakdown of the scores awarded with some additional commentary.

NSN Service Management & MS Operations Lifecycle Framework

Business Process Framework (eTOM) Release 12.0 Conformance

L1 / L2 / L3 Process

L3 Process Score
[L2 Coverage]

Comments

Level 1: 1.1.2 – Service Management & Operations

Level 2: 1.1.2.3 – Service Problem Management

[7/7]

 

1.1.2.3.1 – Create Service Trouble Report

4.3

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.2.3.2 – Diagnose Service Problem

4

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.2.3.3 – Correct & Resolve Service Problem

4

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.2.3.4 – Track & Manage Service Problem

5

Fully Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM).

1.1.2.3.5 – Report Service Problem

3.5

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.2.3.6 – Close Service Trouble Report

5

Fully Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM).

1.1.2.3.7 – Survey & Analyze Service Problem

5

Fully Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM).

Level 2: 1.1.2.4 – Service Quality Management

[7/7]

 

1.1.2.4.1 – Monitor Service Quality

4.5

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.2.4.2 – Analyze Service Quality

5

Fully Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM).

1.1.2.4.3 – Improve Service Quality

4.3

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.2.4.4 – Report Service Quality Performance

4.3

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.2.4.5 – Create Service Performance Degradation Report

4.5

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.2.4.6 – Track & Manage Service Quality Performance Resolution

5

Fully Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM).

1.1.2.4.7 – Close Service Performance Degradation Report

5

Fully Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM).

Level 2: 1.1.3.1 – RM&O Support & Readiness

[6/6]

 

1.1.3.1.1 – Enable Resource Provisioning

0

Not assessed

1.1.3.1.2 – Enable Resource Performance Management

0

Not assessed

1.1.3.1.3 – Support Resource Trouble Management

0

Not assessed

1.1.3.1.4 – Enable Resource Data Collection & Distribution

3.8

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.3.1.5 – Manage Resource Inventory

4.5

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.3.1.7 – Manage Logistics

4.6

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

Level 2: 1.1.3.2 – Resource Provisioning

[8/8]

 

1.1.3.2.1 – Allocate & Install Resource

4.8

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.3.2.2 – Configure & Activate Resource

5

Fully Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM).

1.1.3.2.3 – Test Resource

5

Fully Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM).

1.1.3.2.5 – Track & Manage Resource Provisioning

4.8

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.3.2.6 – Report Resource Provisioning

5

Fully Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM).

1.1.3.2.7 – Close Resource Order

5

Fully Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM).

1.1.3.2.8 – Issue Resource Orders

5

Fully Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM).

1.1.3.2.9 – Recover Resource

4.8

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

Level 2:1.1.3.3 – Resource Trouble Management

[7/7]

 

1.1.3.3.1 – Survey & Analyze Resource Trouble

4

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.3.3.2 – Localize Resource Trouble

4.1

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.3.3.3 – Correct & Resolve Resource Trouble

3

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.3.3.4 – Track & Manage Resource Trouble

4

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.3.3.5 – Report Resource Trouble

4

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.3.3.6 – Close Resource Trouble Report

4

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.3.3.7 – Create Resource Trouble Report

4

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

Level 2: 1.1.3.4 – Resource Performance Management

5

 

1.1.3.4.1 – Monitor Resource Performance

4.3

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.3.4.2 – Analyze Resource Performance

3.8

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.3.4.3 – Control Resource Performance

5

Fully Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM).

1.1.3.4.4 – Report Resource Performance

4

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.3.4.5 – Create Resource Performance Degradation Report

4.5

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.3.4.6 – Track & Manage Resource Performance Resolution

4.9

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.3.4.7 – Close Resource Performance Degradation Report

5

Fully Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM).

Level 2: 1.1.3.5 – Resource Data Collection & Distribution

[6/6]

 

1.1.3.4.1 – Monitor Resource Performance

4.3

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.3.4.2 – Analyze Resource Performance

3.8

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.3.4.3 – Control Resource Performance

5

Fully Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM).

1.1.3.4.4 – Report Resource Performance

4

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.3.4.5 – Create Resource Performance Degradation Report

4.5

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.3.4.6 – Track & Manage Resource Performance Resolution

4.9

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.3.4.7 – Close Resource Performance Degradation Report

5

Fully Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM).

Level 2: 1.1.3.5 – Resource Data Collection & Distribution

[4/4]

 

1.1.3.5.1 – Collect Management Information & Data

4.5

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.1.3.5.2 – Process Management Information & Data

5

Fully Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM).

1.1.3.5.3 – Distribute Management Information & Data

5

Fully Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM).

1.1.3.5.4 – Audit Data Collection & Distribution

5

Fully Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM).

Level 2: 1.1.1.14 – Manage Billing Events

[4/4]

 

1.1.1.14.1 – Enrich Billing Events

5

Fully Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM).

1.1.1.14.2 – Guide Billing Events

5

Fully Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM).

1.1.1.14.3 – Mediate Billing Events

5

Fully Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM).

1.1.1.14.4 – Report Billing Event Records

5

Fully Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM).

Level 2: 1.2.3.2 – Resource Capability Delivery

[7/7]

 

1.2.3.2.1 – Map & Analyze Resource Requirements

3.5

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.2.3.2.2 – Capture Resource Capability Shortfalls

0

Not Assessed

1.2.3.2.3 – Gain Resource Capability Investment Approval

0

Not Assessed

1.2.3.2.4 – Design Resource Capabilities

0

Not Assessed

1.2.3.2.5 – Enable Resource Support & Operations

0

Not Assessed

1.2.3.2.6 – Manage Resource Capability Delivery

4.6

Partially Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM) but with some deviations.
See Mapping Table for more details.

1.2.3.2.7 – Manage Handover to Resource Operations

5

Fully Conformant
Supporting evidence and documentation submitted for the assessment of this level 3 process fulfilled alignment criteria with the standard Business Process Framework (eTOM).

Report Misuse: Frameworx conformance is an important part of enabling the communications industry maintains profitability as it migrates to new services and new business models. Gaining the conformance mark represents a significant investment by both suppliers and service providers. If you feel a company is misusing the conformance mark then please let us know at [email protected].

Disclaimer. TeleManagement Forum has conducted no independent testing of the solution for conformance with its frameworks or standards. Such testing has solely been conducted by the supplier or seller of the product and has been self-assessed by the supplier or seller for adherence to the TeleManagement Forum framework or standard in question. Accordingly, under no circumstances will TeleManagement Forum be liable for any direct or indirect damages or any costs or losses resulting from the use or reliance by any party of or upon such certification.


  • Education & Development
    • About Education & Development
    • Course catalog
    • Recommended courses
    • Course bundles
    • Enterprise Training
    • Success stories
    • Certification
      • What is Certification?
      • TM Forum Skill Paths
      • Certification Leaderboard
      • FAQs
      • Exams
  • Conformance
    • Overview
    • Process Overview
    • Certifications Awarded
    • Business Process Framework Conformance
    • Information Framework Conformance
    • Open API Conformance
    • Success Stories
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Marketing support
TM Forum

Explore TMForum

  • About the Forum
  • Careers with TM Forum
  • News & Insights
  • Privacy Policy
  • Website T&Cs and Cookies
  • Help & FAQ
  • Contact

Contact us

  • General Inquiries: [email protected]
  • Member Services: [email protected]
  • Interested in Joining? [email protected]
  • Press Inquiries: [email protected]

Stay Connected

©2025 TM Forum